Since the 1940s, evolutionary scientists have rejected the view of race according to which a number of finite lists of essential characteristics could be used to determine a like number of races. Many evolutionary and social scientists think common race definitions, or any race definitions pertaining to humans, lack taxonomic rigour and validity. They argue that race definitions are imprecise, arbitrary, derived from custom, and that the races observed vary according to the culture examined. They further maintain that "race" as such is best understood as a social construct, and conceptualize and analyze human genotypic and phenotypic variation in terms of populations and clines instead. Other scientists, however, have argued that this position is motivated more by political than scientific reasons.
Since the 1990s, data and models from genomics and cladistics have resulted in a revolution in the understanding of human evolution, which has led some to propose a new "lineage" definition of race. These scientists have made related arguments that splitting humanity into separate races is valid when they are understood as fuzzy sets, clusters, or extended families.
Liberal Leadership 2006 Blog - Analysis of individual candidates and campaigns
Liberal Party Leadership Blog - Non-aligned charting of developments in the race
Martha Hall Findlay - Official site for her campaign for the federal Liberal leadership.
Meta Description: [ Martha Hall Findlay ]
Michael Ignatieff, MP - Official campaign site for the Liberal Leadership
Meta Description: [ Michael Ignatieff for leader of the Liberal Party of Canada ]
Stéphane Dion, PC, MP - Official site for leader of the federal Liberal Party
| Tour of CeauÅescu's Palace in Bucharest, Romania | |
| Next Video | |